R. Polk Wagner
Michael A. Fitts Professor of Law
Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs & Innovation
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
I'm a law professor and Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs & Innovation at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School. I work on intellectual property, AI, and legal education.
I teach and write about intellectual property, especially patent law, and I spend a lot of my time helping law faculty, judges, and the legal profession engage with AI tools. I'm also working with Penn Law's leadership to figure out what AI means for the future of legal education.
Current
A few things I'm focused on right now.
- Building out TRAIL, the law school's new initiative on technology, regulation, and AI
- Working with judges and their chambers on the practical use of AI, through the PennLaw–Judiciary AI Testbed, the Judicial AI Portal, and recent talks to the Sixth Circuit Judicial Conference and the Federal Judicial Center
- Running the second wave of the AI Final Exam Project with students and colleagues in the Penn Carey Law AI Project — testing whether current AI can pass real law school finals, graded on the class curve by the faculty who wrote them
- Researching how AI tools can enhance patent law claim construction
- Teaching Patent Law and Patent Law Appellate Advocacy for academic year 2026–27
Leadership
I've served as Deputy Dean for Academic Affairs & Innovation at Penn Law since January 2024; I held a prior iteration of this role from 2016 to 2018. In this position I work closely with the Dean and faculty on curriculum, academic policy, innovations in pedagogy, and institutional strategy — including coordinating the law school's work on AI in legal education.
Before this appointment, I served as Faculty Director of PennLaw Online from 2018 to 2023, where I helped build and oversee Penn Law's online education programs. I've chaired or served on a number of the law school's committees over the years, including the Faculty Appointments Committee, the Educational Programs Committee, the Academic Careers Committee, and the Building Committee.
At the university level, I've served on the Provost's Council on Research, the Center for Technology Transfer Governing Board, and the Conflict of Interest Standing Committee.
AI & Innovation
AI is changing how law is practiced, taught, and understood — and legal education needs to keep up. I've spent the last few years working to make sure Penn Law is out in front of this shift. Not with hype and not with fear, but with the kind of practical, hands-on engagement that actually helps faculty, students, and the institution.
That work now sits within TRAIL — Technology, Regulation, AI, and the Law — the law school's initiative connecting curriculum, experiential learning, and faculty research on the technologies reshaping law, work, and society. TRAIL launched in September 2026 with a leadership gift from the Perry and Donna Golkin Family Foundation, and it's a major part of my portfolio as Deputy Dean.
One major aspect of the build-and-apply side of TRAIL is the Penn Carey Law AI Project, which I direct. It's where the tools, training, and applied research get made: an AI exam grader, a casebook builder, a virtual teaching assistant bound to a single course's materials, and a study of whether current AI can pass real Penn Carey Law finals when graded on the class curve by the faculty who wrote them. Everything is open source by default and built for the people who will actually use it — students, faculty, judges, and practicing lawyers.
Some of it reaches the bench, too. Through the PennLaw–Judiciary AI Testbed, I work with judges and their chambers — in the Third Circuit, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the District of New Jersey, and the Delaware Court of Chancery — on the practical use of AI tools, with structured access, training, and regular feedback. What we've learned there feeds the Judicial AI Portal, a plain-language public guide for judges and chambers staff on use cases, risks, and guardrails.
On the concrete side, I maintain two open portals for faculty: pedagogy resources — a single place for guidance, policies, and examples on exams, grading, AI, and accommodations — and an AI resources hub covering tools, use cases, policies, and agentic-AI guidance. This fall we launched a Certificate of Study in AI and Law, developed jointly with Penn Engineering. We've also brought professional-grade AI tools directly into the law school — Harvey and Legora for legal work, a Claude seat for every 1L, and enterprise Claude and ChatGPT available to faculty and staff — and the Madhani Legal Tech Fellowship supports students doing innovative work in legal technology.
My view on all of this is pretty straightforward: faculty should be using these tools, not avoiding them. The students already are. The practicing bar already is. Legal education can either lead or react — and I'd rather we lead.
Penn Carey Law AI Project
Research · Build · Teach. The Project researches how AI is changing legal practice, legal education, and the law itself; builds the tools that put those findings to work; and teaches lawyers, law students, judges, and the profession how to use AI well. pennai.law
Recent AI Presentations
Open Source Tools
I've built and open-sourced a set of Claude Code skills for law faculty — practical, ready-to-use tools for class preparation, exam question generation, lecture slide review, document production, and more. I've also released a PDF-to-markdown converter optimized for legal casebooks, and a collection of custom GPT system cards for legal education workflows.
Teaching
I primarily teach intellectual property and patent law at Penn Law, across the 1L and upper-level curriculum.
Introduction to Intellectual Property Law & Policy
A 1L elective surveying the major IP regimes: patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, and the right of publicity. The course focuses on how these systems overlap, where they conflict, and why the boundaries between them matter.
Patent Law
An upper-level deep look at patent doctrine, prosecution, and litigation — and the policy questions running through all of it. Who should get patents, how broad should they be, and what happens when the system breaks down.
Patent Law Appellate Advocacy (Giles S. Rich Intellectual Property Moot Court)
Students brief and argue a simulated Federal Circuit patent appeal before a panel of judges — full briefs, full oral arguments. One of the most intensive upper-level experiences we offer.
I've also taught Contracts, Property, Advanced Patent Law, Electronic Commerce, Journal of Law & Innovation Seminar, and courses through PennLaw Online, including Introduction to Patent Law and Intellectual Property in Health Care.
Courses on Coursera
I teach three courses on Coursera through the University of Pennsylvania, two of them in the four-course Intellectual Property Law Specialization:
Research & Publications
My research focuses on patent law, intellectual property, and the federal courts — particularly how doctrinal rules interact with the institutions that apply them. Some highlights:
Working Papers
-
Heron in the Classroom: A Faculty-Built AI Teaching Assistant for Legal Education
Work in progress, 2026 -
Can AI Ace Your Exam? A Penn Law Experiment
Work in progress, 2026
Selected Publications
-
Teva and the Process of Claim Construction
70 Florida Law Review 379 (2018) (with L. Petherbridge) -
Poisoning the Next Apple? The America Invents Act and Individual Inventors
65 Stanford Law Review 517 (2013) (with D. Abrams) -
Unenforceability
70 Washington & Lee Law Review 1751 (2013) (with L. Petherbridge & J. Rantanen) -
Life After Bilski
63 Stanford Law Review 1315 (2011) (with M. Lemley, M. Risch & T. Sichelman) -
The Two Federal Circuits
43 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 785 (2010) -
Understanding Patent Quality Mechanisms
157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2135 (2009) -
The Federal Circuit and Patentability: An Empirical Assessment of the Law of Obviousness
85 Texas Law Review 2051 (2007) (with L. Petherbridge) -
Patent Portfolios
154 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1 (2005) (with G. Parchomovsky) -
Is the Federal Circuit Succeeding? An Empirical Assessment of Judicial Performance
152 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1105 (2004) (with L. Petherbridge) -
Information Wants to Be Free: Intellectual Property and the Mythologies of Control
103 Columbia Law Review 995 (2003)
SSRN Author Page
Google Scholar
ORCID
OpenAlex
Penn Scholarly Commons
Sailing
When I'm not at the law school, I'm usually on or near the water. I've been racing sailboats since college — I was on the varsity sailing team at the College of Charleston and was named ICSA All-American Crew in 1990 — and I've never really stopped.
These days I race a Melges 15, a Laser (ILCA), and a J/70 — mostly out of Little Traverse Yacht Club in Harbor Springs, Michigan. On the M15 circuit, I finished 2nd in the Masters Division at the 2025 U.S. National Championship. In the J/70 class, I served on the International Executive Committee and as Technical Chair from 2016 to 2023, and placed 5th in the Corinthian Division at the 2019 North American Championship. I've been competitive in the Harbor Springs Laser fleet and the LTYC J/70 fleet for years, with multiple season wins in both.
I've completed 20 Chicago-Mackinac Races and 15 Bayview-Mackinac Races. In 2021, our team on the J/111 No Surprise won the Mackinac Cup — the overall prize for the Chicago race — with additional class wins in 2018 and 2022. I've also won class in the Queen's Cup aboard the J/111 Striking Back in 2023 and 2024.
Off the water, I've served as a World Sailing International Measurer and have completed the US Sailing Principal Race Officer course. I served as Rear Commodore of Little Traverse Yacht Club from 2018 to 2020, and as President of Little Traverse Sailors from 2016 to 2019.
Melges 15 Class
J/70 International Class
ILCA International Class